← Back to Plaza
El científico francés Louis Pasteur dijo: "un poco de ciencia aleja d...
TikTok

El científico francés Louis Pasteur dijo: "un poco de ciencia aleja d...

147.1k views·May 30, 2026
Open original video ↗

Transcript

0:00says and he will be by a cross
0:02and ended up crucified
0:04what happens that crucifixion is also a lie
0:06no no no one says it but Isaías
0:11750 years before the birth of Jesus says that the
0:16will die hanging from a tree in Madero
0:20and it is interesting because the crucifixion
0:22does not exist as a punishment in Israel in Judea
0:26among the Jews
0:27at the time of
0:29with which it really
0:29doesn't even know what he is talking about.
0:31why because he did not know what crucifixion was
0:35comes to Judea by the Romans crucifixion is an invention
0:40say Persian
0:41but the Romans take it and practice it regularly.
0:44okay,
0:45so that's it
0:46is saying it says and will be born of a virgin
0:50Daniel says and will come at this time
0:55and says when
0:57Daniel's septenas
0:59and comes at that moment
1:02and I believe that Zacarías the one who says and his friends will sell it.
1:06and will be buried
1:08in a rich man's tomb
1:10and will be dead among bandits and everything comes true
1:15he is dead,
1:16we know he lived between two eh thieves.
1:18the good and the bad
1:20we know that he is buried by Joseph of Arimathea who was rich.
1:25we know that his friends sell him Judas
1:28we know that I think it is eh
1:31Malachi the one who says and they will be for 30 silver coins.
1:3430 silver coins,
1:35which by the way is not a normal amount.
1:39as I put in the book
1:40each of these things begins to come true
1:42what are the chances of this happening
1:45in an individual
1:46well,
1:46there is a Protestant author who calculates
1:48says how many chances are 8
1:52of these are fulfilled
1:53110 raised to -28
1:56i.e., it is practically
1:57impossible is as if you were in the lottery
2:00from now until you die every day
2:02someone could say that we are cheating
2:05there is a better chance that this will happen.
2:07that they have been fulfilled
2:08in Jesus or any other person only 8
2:11of the more than 200 prophecies
2:14and they are prophecies that are written
2:17centuries before Jesus Christ
2:19then the skeptic will say well,
2:21but they have been modified.
2:23to make it work,
2:26right?
2:27what bad luck we have found all Isaías
2:31the whole book of
2:33in the manuscripts of the kumra
2:35writes 750 years of Jesus Christ but we have a copy of 400
2:39years before Jesus Christ
2:41and all
2:42the same book of that you have in the Bible in your house
2:45that I hope you have
2:46that's exactly word for word
2:49since the fourth century before Jesus Christ you cannot
2:53keep looking for the cracks the cracks you can
2:56you realize it's the skepticism of cracks
2:58I'm not going to look for something to go on
3:00not believing that no and there is much no I am not saying
3:02I am saying no
3:03I mean there are many
3:04evidence given as this is not true.
3:08and only a few years ago they have been discovering each other
3:11pools are being discovered
3:14in good for all Israel
3:16which coincides with the information in the gospels.

Mind Map

Loading mind map…

Viral Breakdown

Hook (first 3 seconds)

  • Verbatim opening: "Says and he will be by a cross and ended up crucified. What happens? That crucifixion is also a lie."
  • Hook pattern: Bold claim + question. The speaker challenges a widely accepted historical fact (crucifixion) as a "lie," immediately creating controversy.
  • Why it stops scroll: It frames a familiar biblical narrative as potentially false, triggering cognitive dissonance. Viewers who believe the story feel compelled to defend it; skeptics are intrigued by the "exposure." The rapid-fire delivery and rhetorical question ("What happens?") maintain urgency.

Emotional Rhythm

  • Beat 1 – Curiosity: "Crucifixion is also a lie" – sparks disbelief and intrigue.
  • Beat 2 – Tension: "No one says it but Isaías 750 years before..." – introduces a specific prophecy, building suspense.
  • Beat 3 – Twist: "Crucifixion does not exist as a punishment in Israel... comes to Judea by the Romans" – reveals a historical gap, creating a "gotcha" moment.
  • Beat 4 – Escalation: Lists multiple prophecies (virgin birth, 30 silver coins, rich man's tomb) with rapid examples, raising stakes.
  • Beat 5 – Climax: "What are the chances... 110 raised to -28... practically impossible" – delivers the emotional peak with a statistical "proof."
  • Beat 6 – Relief/Resonance: "You cannot keep looking for the cracks... skepticism of cracks" – reframes doubt as a flaw in the viewer, not the evidence, creating a satisfying "aha" for believers.

Keyword Density

  • "Crucifixion" – 6 mentions. Algorithmic reach: high search volume for religious/historical debates. Emotional pull: triggers controversy.
  • "Prophecies" / "prophecies" – 5 mentions. Algorithmic reach: niche but high engagement in Christian content. Emotional pull: builds authority.
  • "Jesus Christ" – 3 mentions. Algorithmic reach: evergreen, massive search volume. Emotional pull: core identity for target audience.
  • "Impossible" / "practically impossible" – 2 mentions. Emotional pull: creates awe and finality.
  • "Skeptic" / "skepticism" – 3 mentions. Emotional pull: frames opposition as irrational, rallying believers.
  • "750 years" / "400 years" – 2 mentions. Algorithmic reach: time-based numbers boost click-through. Emotional pull: emphasizes historical weight.
  • "Cracks" – 3 mentions. Emotional pull: metaphor for doubt, easy to remember and share.

Why It Spreads

  1. Contrarian framing triggers debate: The opening "crucifixion is also a lie" invites both believers (to defend) and skeptics (to mock). This creates comment-section warfare, which boosts algorithmic engagement. Concrete line: "What happens? That crucifixion is also a lie."
  2. Statistical "proof" creates shareable awe: The "110 raised to -28" number is a concrete, surprising fact that viewers can quote or challenge. It's a classic "mind-blown" moment that drives shares in religious groups. Concrete line: "What are the chances... 110 raised to -28... practically impossible."
  3. Historical specificity builds authority: Mentioning "Kumra manuscripts" (Dead Sea Scrolls) and "400 years before Jesus Christ" gives the video an academic veneer, making it feel credible and worth sharing as "evidence." Concrete line: "We have a copy of 400 years before Jesus Christ and all the same book."
  4. Emotional closure for believers: The "skepticism of cracks" line reframes doubt as a character flaw, giving viewers a satisfying "us vs. them" narrative. This emotional payoff encourages shares within faith communities. Concrete line: "It's the skepticism of cracks; I'm not going to look for something to go on not believing."

What You Can Steal

  1. Open with a bold, debatable claim – Start your video by challenging a widely held belief (e.g., "Everything you know about X is wrong"). This immediately stops the scroll and forces engagement, even from skeptics.
  2. Use a "list of evidence" structure – Rapidly fire 3-5 specific examples (prophecies, historical dates, numbers) in quick succession. This builds momentum and makes your argument feel irrefutable. Keep each point under 10 seconds.
  3. End with a reframe that flips doubt – After presenting evidence, pivot to a psychological insight (e.g., "The real problem is not the facts, but your skepticism"). This gives viewers a sense of superiority and a reason to share the video as a "truth bomb."
Keep exploring

More viral transcripts on Plaza

Drag to browse, or open one to see the full transcript and AI breakdown. Browse all on Plaza →