← Back to Plaza
Ielts Speaking P3 Practice #ielts #hoctienganh #ieltsspeaking #marktu...
TikTok

Ielts Speaking P3 Practice #ielts #hoctienganh #ieltsspeaking #marktu...

58.1k views·May 15, 2026
Open original video ↗

Transcript

0:00AI generated music should should be considered real music.
0:04the answer is Simple no
0:06It never was and It never Will be I'll Speak in part three
0:11AI and music
0:12The question should AI generated music be considered real music
0:17well to be honest
0:18this topic hits me on a personal level
0:21because music has Always been more interesting
0:23to me is memory and human experience
0:27Now AI can generate lyrics
0:30compose melodies and can even Produce
0:33technically Perfect songs in minutes
0:36from a technical standpoint that's pretty Damn impressive
0:39but you gotta remember
0:41music was never meant to be technical
0:44It was meant to be felt.
0:47you see
0:47Learning a musical instrument takes years of practice
0:51Pain of hard work and discipline
0:54you struggle with timing
0:56hidden to wrong Notes and slowly build your Muscle memory
1:00and when you perform
1:02whether is a funk groove R and B
1:05Country or a Symbol ballad you are not just playing Notes
1:09you are telling a story you are sharing a message
1:13Now AI can imitate sound
1:15but It cannot experience that Journey
1:18It cannot feel nervous.
1:20before a Performance or connect with an audience
1:23i've listened to AI generated
1:25i've listened to AI generated music
1:28and while It sounds clean and polish
1:31there's something Missing there's no Soul
1:34you see music is a Universal
1:37language because It connects people
1:39not algorithms
1:41so while AI can be a powerful tool in music production
1:45It cannot Replace the human Spirit.
1:48behind music so to answer the question
1:54the answer is Simple
1:56It never was and It never Will be
2:00Let me explain the analysis.
2:02It's bad in my sample answer.
2:03The first paragraph I used was a handle.
2:09The letter hit.
2:10Everybody knows it's hitting something.
2:12So here I am using the word hit with the idea that
2:15This topic touches me.
2:17hits me on a personal level
2:18That's a phrase that you can use on this subject.
2:20The first is that AI can generate
2:22create lyrics that create the lyrics
2:24compose melody
2:25It means making things,
2:27a series of music.
2:28and Produce technically
2:30Perfect songs
2:31And we can produce the perfect music.
2:33Another word I use is from a technical.
2:36It means from a technical point of view.
2:39perspective on one aspect.
2:41And what does this look like professionally?
2:43I used to say that's pretty.
2:46Damn impressive.
2:48It means very
2:49Impression of words
2:50Jam here may not mean mean shit,
2:52but...
2:53I insist on the point of view.
2:55I accept.
2:56And with AI,
2:56it's able to create very,
2:57very perfect music.
2:58The final change.
2:59Did I use a French one?
3:01The blessing is me.
3:02I started by using the word why.
3:04Let's give you two contrasts of two ideas.
3:06The first sentence I use is why I've listened to you.
3:10AI music generator generator and why
3:12It means that even though I know
3:17while the music that's produced by AI is Ra
3:19It sounds very clean and sounds very clean.
3:22That sounds good,
3:23Chu.
3:24clean polish polish
3:25Even though it sounds very nice,
3:27it sounds very clean.
3:28But it has something it lacks.
3:31know there's no Soul
3:33A song without a soul.
3:34It's like a song.
3:35It's too good.
3:36It's too technical.
3:37It loses its nature.
3:38I lost the soul of the song.
3:40I turned around and answered the question.
3:41AI should generate music be consider real music
3:45Then I close the sentence.
3:46And this answer is Simple.
3:49It never was.
3:50It never Will be
3:51It's never been considered real music.
3:53and in the future
3:54will never be
3:55It replaced the last sentence I used.
3:56It never
3:57Will be,
3:57this is really not grammatical.
3:59The truth is,
4:00it will never be.
4:01I deliberately used the word never.
4:03In the middle,
4:04I want to emphasize that.
4:05Really many times.
4:06Can I speak French a little bit wrong?
4:08As long as I can get my emotions into the audience.
4:10People can feel it.
4:11That's speaking.
4:13Thank you for listening,
4:15I hope you can.
4:16to pull out some words
4:17Some ideas that you can use in
4:19The upcoming iOS speaking section
4:21If you get the topic.
4:23And if you have any questions,
4:25or what topics you need.
4:27support,
4:27I need to make a video to solve a problem for you.
4:31Speaking, you can.
4:32Comment below and I will.
4:35Make a video to answer for you.

Mind Map

Loading mind map…

Viral Breakdown

Hook (first 3 seconds)

  • Verbatim opening: "AI generated music should be considered real music. The answer is simple: no. It never was and it never will be."
  • Hook pattern: Bold claim + direct contradiction (sets up a definitive, controversial stance)
  • Why it stops scrolling: The speaker immediately declares a polarizing opinion with absolute certainty ("never was, never will be"), creating instant curiosity and emotional friction. Viewers either agree strongly or want to hear the justification, forcing them to stay.

Emotional Rhythm

  1. Curiosity + Tension (0:00–0:10): The bold "no" and "never" statements create a confrontational vibe—viewers feel challenged.
  2. Personal resonance (0:10–0:25): "Hits me on a personal level... music is memory and human experience." Shifts from debate to vulnerability, softening the tension.
  3. Relatable struggle (0:25–0:40): Describes the pain of learning an instrument—"years of practice, pain, wrong notes"—evoking empathy from musicians.
  4. Contrast (0:40–0:55): "AI can imitate sound but cannot experience that journey." Builds a clear emotional binary: human vs. machine.
  5. Climax (0:55–1:10): "There's no soul." This is the emotional peak—a single, resonant phrase that crystallizes the argument.
  6. Resolution (1:10–1:20): Repeats the opening line ("never was, never will be") as a definitive, closed-loop conclusion.

Keyword Density

  • "Never" (repeated 5+ times) – Drives algorithmic reach via strong, absolute language; creates memorability.
  • "Soul" (3 times) – Emotional pull; a high-resonance word that triggers nostalgia and human connection.
  • "Music" (10+ times) – Core topic keyword for algorithmic categorization.
  • "Human" / "Experience" (4–5 times) – Emotional pull; contrasts with "technical/algorithm."
  • "Technical" / "Perfect" (3 times) – Algorithmic reach (searchable terms); sets up the contrast with "soul."
  • "Feel" / "Felt" (2 times) – Emotional pull; reinforces the heart vs. logic theme.

Why It Spreads

  1. Polarizing thesis invites debate – The opening "no, never" is a direct attack on a growing trend (AI music). Viewers who disagree will comment to argue, boosting engagement. Transcript evidence: "The answer is simple: no. It never was and it never will be."
  2. Personal storytelling builds trust – The speaker doesn't just argue; they share a vulnerable memory ("music is memory and human experience"). This makes the opinion feel authentic, not just rage-bait. Transcript evidence: "This topic hits me on a personal level."
  3. Relatable struggle creates tribe identity – Describing the pain of learning an instrument ("years of practice, wrong notes") unites musicians against a common enemy (AI). Shared identity drives shares. Transcript evidence: "You struggle with timing, hit the wrong notes, slowly build your muscle memory."
  4. Simple, repeatable catchphrase – "Never was, never will be" is a sticky, rhythmic phrase that viewers can easily quote or meme. It becomes a shareable soundbite. Transcript evidence: Repeated verbatim at start and end.
  5. Self-aware meta-analysis – The speaker then breaks down their own script (the second half of the transcript), teaching viewers why the argument worked. This adds educational value, making the video a "how-to" as well as a hot take. Transcript evidence: "The first paragraph I used was a handle... I used the word 'hit' with the idea that this topic touches me."

What You Can Steal

  1. Start with a polarizing, absolute statement – Use "never," "always," "no," or "yes" in the first 3 seconds. It forces viewers to take a side and stay for the justification.
  2. Anchor your argument in a personal memory – Instead of just stating an opinion, connect it to a specific human experience (e.g., "I remember struggling with..."). This makes you relatable, not preachy.
  3. Bookend your video with the same strong line – Repeat your core phrase at the start and end. It creates closure, increases memorability, and gives viewers a quotable takeaway to share.
Keep exploring

More viral transcripts on Plaza

Drag to browse, or open one to see the full transcript and AI breakdown. Browse all on Plaza →